Petty Arguments: Avoiding Wars of Attrition
- Love's War
- Sep 1, 2015
- 2 min read
Updated: Dec 23, 2024

“Roll up the window, I'm cold!”
“But if I roll it up, I'm going to start sweating.”
“But then I'm going to be cold and shivering and I DON'T want that!”
“Yeah and I'll be sweaty when I get out the car and it IS cold outside, that'll be uncomfortable too!”
Anddddddd so this particular argument went on for some time, according to my friend. We all get into these little spats where neither person is really wrong for feeling the way they feel, so how exactly do you end it? (Especially when neither person can really claim more importance for their position than the other.) It would seem someone is going to be uncomfortable, no matter what, so why exactly is there a fight to begin with. Because someone has to submit to their partners wishes and in a game of relationship chicken, the person who blinks first loses.
But that isn't always the way it has to be. Whether it's forgoing quiet time to spend it with the family or missing out on brunch to save a bit for a long term purchase, relationships as most of know is about give and take. Since that is the way relationships have operated for centuries, you'd think it wouldn't be so difficult for one adult in a two-person tiff to acquiesce to their partners wishes for the sake of peace, considering the fact that at some point they will have to be submitted to as well. However, as egalitarian as that point may be, few of us willingly give in to our partners wishes without some haggling, crying, yelling, and tension before hand. We do this because no matter how equal our relationships actually are, as individuals we generally assume we do more, sacrifice more, and are the most flexible in the relationship, regardless of the reality of the situation.
So do yourself and your partner a favor and try to give in willingly without all the extra negotiating, because if you're in a relatively healthy relationship your partner will have to give in to you eventually.
Rather than ending any petty argument in a power struggle over something like the temperature in the car, think on what is the best case scenario for all parties involved. (In the above case, simple logic dictates the sweaty person wins; it takes time for clothes to dry, if you're getting somewhere pretty quickly, you can just sit in the car for a few minutes to warm up or alternate between two temperatures until you both arrive at the destination. Why this turned into an hour long shouting match defies all kinds of logic :-)
Comments